SUMMER 2007
READ THIS!

AUTUMN 2006
READ THIS!

SUMMER 2006
READ THIS!

SPRING 2006 READ THIS!

WINTER 2006 READ THIS

AUTUMN 2005 READ THIS!

SUMMER 2005 READ THIS!

SUGGESTION BOX

Recent Comments

« November 2006 | Main | January 2007 »

Dec 22, 2006

Underrated Writers Project

One of our members, Jeff Bryant (Syntax of Things), in conjunction with Trevor of Creekside Review, just posted their second annual, Underrated Writers Project.  Jeff and Trevor asked many other LBC members to be involved this year.  Beyond that added interest, it seems that the UWP also has a very similar mission to that of the LBC.  It is with this in mind that we suggest our readers wander over and take a look at the long list of great writers Jeff, Trevor and their friends have come up with.

Specific mentions must be made of authors in this year's version of the UWP that have also been Litblog Co-op nominees:  Elizabeth Crane, Ed Falco, Jeffrey Ford, Kirby Gann, Michael Martone, Lance Olsen, Sam Savage and Jean-Phillipe Touissant.  And a few of them weren't even nominated by LBC'ers!

Dec 08, 2006

On nominating a book

[cross-posted from Fernham]

Next quarter is my first one “up” with a nominee at the Litblog Co-op. I nominated Valerie Trueblood’s first novel, Seven Loves. It’s the story of a woman’s life through seven people whom she’s loved: a moving conceit and a novel that more than lives up to it. It’s a terrific book.

I was so intimidated in my quest for a book to nominate. I got really focused on finding a book that the other bloggers would like, forgetting that I needed to find one that I liked. I also spent a lot of time thinking about how many, many new books other bloggers must see all the time. I don’t work in a great bookstore; I don’t have an MFA and lots of friends from grad school days; I don’t get all that many free books. How could I possibly find a book that would really deserve touting?

I thought about what I wanted and missed from the past couple quarters since I started participating. I decided that I wanted to find either an African book or a book by a woman. I couldn’t find the African novel I wanted: some great-sounding books were just a little bit too old; lots and lots of first novels by African women sounded formulaic; Chimamanda Adichie’s book came out to so much acclaim that nominating it would harldy fulfill the mission of the LBC; Tsitsi Dangarembga’s second book came out so quietly, I didn’t notice it.

I turned to women writers. I wanted the woman’s book to have an unobtrusively feminist perspective and a female protagonist. Maybe that sounds heretical to the aesthetes among you. I insist on great writing and I felt that I’d read a lot of great writing from nominees. But I wanted to read great writing from a woman that sounded womanly to me. Edie Meidav and Sheila Heti (I almost called her Sheila Ticknor) ventriloquize a male voice and write about men; Gina Frangello’s S&M book was too sexual for me. So, I worried and struggled and, when the babies slept, I went back onto amazon.com and typed in book after book that I liked to see if the recommendations would yield a surprise.

Then, out of the blue, I got a sweet email from someone who, from reading my blog, thought, that, perhaps, I would like her novel. Might she send me a copy?

Well, as you know, I love free books. I said yes.

And the rest is history. I read Seven Loves. I loved it. I nominated it. And, on January 15, the discussion will begin. What a round it should be: the firework-y men’s book I’ve come to expect, the African novel I sought and did not find, and Trueblood’s beautiful, moving, strong story. Stay tuned….

Dec 06, 2006

All the best things...

Well, secret histories and con men anyway.

Jeff Ford, whose The Girl in the Glass was an LBC nominee last spring, recently participated in a roundtable on both those things at the Eos Books blog. The other participants are a star's cast for a salon with the best conversation ever: John Crowley (Lord Byron's Novel), Tim Powers (Three Days to Never), and James Morrow (The Last Witchfinder). Several topics from the spring--research and historical accuracy, to name a couple--make their way into the conversation.

At one point, Ford says:

For me it is not that what I write I am not, but I most certainly do feel that the person who writes the books is a wholly other consciousness than my own. There are places where they intersect, but the one who writes, in his manipulation and extension of metaphor is doing something I don't think I could do if I intellectually considered it.

Their discussion is in three parts and highly recommended: